![Lyna⁷ on Twitter: "Sartre describes two distinct categories of being: the in -itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi). This would translate as non-conscious (a rock, a chair, air) and consciousness (human being). https://t.co/jeLq1UnWWk" / Lyna⁷ on Twitter: "Sartre describes two distinct categories of being: the in -itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi). This would translate as non-conscious (a rock, a chair, air) and consciousness (human being). https://t.co/jeLq1UnWWk" /](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EiXCvcNWoAEzLRp.jpg)
Lyna⁷ on Twitter: "Sartre describes two distinct categories of being: the in -itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi). This would translate as non-conscious (a rock, a chair, air) and consciousness (human being). https://t.co/jeLq1UnWWk" /
![Being-for-itself, Being-in-itself - Being-for-itself, Being-in-itself Being- for-itself For Sartre, - Studocu Being-for-itself, Being-in-itself - Being-for-itself, Being-in-itself Being- for-itself For Sartre, - Studocu](https://d20ohkaloyme4g.cloudfront.net/img/document_thumbnails/651ae09e768ce7502106001390f70c56/thumb_300_388.png)
Being-for-itself, Being-in-itself - Being-for-itself, Being-in-itself Being- for-itself For Sartre, - Studocu
![EXISTENTIALISM Existential thinkers: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Camus, Jaspers, Heidegger and Sartre. Kierkegaard's existential conception of subjectivity. - ppt video online download EXISTENTIALISM Existential thinkers: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Camus, Jaspers, Heidegger and Sartre. Kierkegaard's existential conception of subjectivity. - ppt video online download](https://slideplayer.com/slide/3775746/13/images/26/The+Facticity+of+the+For-Itself.jpg)
EXISTENTIALISM Existential thinkers: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Camus, Jaspers, Heidegger and Sartre. Kierkegaard's existential conception of subjectivity. - ppt video online download
![Note 11 - philosphy - Being in itself: a being of which nothing can be affirmed, but that it is in - Studocu Note 11 - philosphy - Being in itself: a being of which nothing can be affirmed, but that it is in - Studocu](https://d20ohkaloyme4g.cloudfront.net/img/document_thumbnails/1dee03337b135078c3a5551b6beee469/thumb_1200_1698.png)
Note 11 - philosphy - Being in itself: a being of which nothing can be affirmed, but that it is in - Studocu
![DOC) BEING-IN-ITSELF (L'ETRE-EN-SOI) AND BEING-FOR-ITSELF (L'ETRE-POUR- SOI) IN SATRE'S BEING AND NOTHINGNESS BEING-IN-ITSELF (L'ETRE-EN-SOI) AND BEING-FOR-ITSELF (L'ETRE-POUR- SOI) IN SATRE'S BEING AND NOTHINGNESS | Ezurike O S O R A C H U K W U DOC) BEING-IN-ITSELF (L'ETRE-EN-SOI) AND BEING-FOR-ITSELF (L'ETRE-POUR- SOI) IN SATRE'S BEING AND NOTHINGNESS BEING-IN-ITSELF (L'ETRE-EN-SOI) AND BEING-FOR-ITSELF (L'ETRE-POUR- SOI) IN SATRE'S BEING AND NOTHINGNESS | Ezurike O S O R A C H U K W U](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/55397561/mini_magick20180818-29556-1y9lo4f.png?1534649805)
DOC) BEING-IN-ITSELF (L'ETRE-EN-SOI) AND BEING-FOR-ITSELF (L'ETRE-POUR- SOI) IN SATRE'S BEING AND NOTHINGNESS BEING-IN-ITSELF (L'ETRE-EN-SOI) AND BEING-FOR-ITSELF (L'ETRE-POUR- SOI) IN SATRE'S BEING AND NOTHINGNESS | Ezurike O S O R A C H U K W U
![Lyna⁷ on Twitter: "Sartre describes two distinct categories of being: the in -itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi). This would translate as non-conscious (a rock, a chair, air) and consciousness (human being). https://t.co/jeLq1UnWWk" / Lyna⁷ on Twitter: "Sartre describes two distinct categories of being: the in -itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi). This would translate as non-conscious (a rock, a chair, air) and consciousness (human being). https://t.co/jeLq1UnWWk" /](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EiYvZeKXkAA46f3.jpg)